We show that the GCD of two univariate polynomials can be computed by (piece-wise) algebraic circuits of constant depth and polynomial size over any sufficiently large field, regardless of the characteristic. This extends a recent result of Andrews \& Wigderson who showed such an upper bound over fields of zero or large characteristic. Our proofs are based on a recent work of Bhattacharjee, Kumar, Rai, Ramanathan, Saptharishi \& Saraf that shows closure of constant depth algebraic circuits under factorization. On our way to the proof, we show that any n-variate symmetric polynomial P that has a small constant depth algebraic circuit can be written as the composition of a small constant depth algebraic circuit with elementary symmetric polynomials. This statement is a constant depth version of a result of Bl\"{a}ser \& Jindal, who showed this for algebraic circuits of unbounded depth. As an application of our techniques, we also strengthen the closure results for factors of constant-depth circuits in the work of Bhattacharjee et al. over fields for small characteristic.

We show that algebraic formulas and constant-depth circuits are \emph{closed} under taking factors. In other words, we show that if a multivariate polynomial over a field of characteristic zero has a small constant-depth circuit or formula, then all its factors can be computed by small constant-depth circuits or formulas respectively. Our result turns out to be an elementary consequence of a fundamental and surprising result of Furstenberg from the 1960s, which gives a non-iterative description of the power series roots of a bivariate polynomial. Combined with standard structural ideas in algebraic complexity, we observe that this theorem yields the desired closure results. As applications, we get alternative (and perhaps simpler) proofs of various known results and strengthen the quantitative bounds in some of them. This includes a unified proof of known closure results for algebraic models (circuits, branching programs and VNP), an extension of the analysis of the Kabanets-Impagliazzo hitting set generator to formulas and constant-depth circuits, and a (significantly) simpler proof of correctness as well as stronger guarantees on the output in the subexponential time deterministic algorithm for factorization of constant-depth circuits from a recent work of Bhattacharjee, Kumar, Ramanathan, Saptharishi \& Saraf.

While efficient randomized algorithms for factorization of polynomials given by algebraic circuits have been known for decades, obtaining an even slightly non-trivial deterministic algorithm for this problem has remained an open question of great interest. This is true even when the input algebraic circuit has additional structure, for instance, when it is a constant-depth circuit. Indeed, no efficient deterministic algorithms are known even for the seemingly easier problem of factoring sparse polynomials or even the problem of testing the irreducibility of sparse polynomials. In this work, we make progress on these questions: we design a deterministic algorithm that runs in subexponential time, and when given as input a constant-depth algebraic circuit C over the field of rational numbers, it outputs algebraic circuits (of potentially unbounded depth) for all the irreducible factors of C, together with their multiplicities. In particular, we give the first subexponential time deterministic algorithm for factoring sparse polynomials. For our proofs, we rely on a finer understanding of the structure of power series roots of constant-depth circuits and the analysis of the Kabanets-Impagliazzo generator. In particular, we show that the Kabanets-Impagliazzo generator constructed using low-degree hard polynomials (explicitly constructed in the work of Limaye, Srinivasan & Tavenas) preserves not only the non-zeroness of small constant-depth circuits (as shown by Chou, Kumar & Solomon), but also their irreducibility and the irreducibility of their factors.

Valiant's famous VP vs. VNP conjecture states that the symbolic permanent polynomial does not have polynomial-size algebraic circuits. However, the best upper bound on the size of the circuits computing the permanent is exponential. Informally, VNP is an exponential sum of VP-circuits. In this paper we study whether, in general, exponential sums of algebraic circuits require exponential-size algebraic circuits. We show that the famous Shub-Smale tau-conjecture indeed implies such an exponential lower bound for an exponential sum. Our main tools come from parameterized complexity. Along the way, we also prove an exponential fpt (fixed-parameter tractable) lower bound for the parameterized algebraic complexity class VW[P] (constant-free, unbounded degree), assuming the same conjecture. VW[P] can be thought of as the weighted sums of (unbounded-degree) circuits, where only +1/-1 constants are cost-free. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time the Shub-Smale tau-conjecture has been applied to prove explicit exponential lower bounds. Furthermore, we prove that when this class is fpt, then a variant of the counting hierarchy, namely the linear counting hierarchy collapses. Moreover, if a certain type of parameterized exponential sums is fpt, then integers, as well as polynomials with coefficients being definable in the linear counting hierarchy have subpolynomial tau-complexity. Finally, we characterize a related class VW[F]$, in terms of permanents, where we consider an exponential sum of algebraic formulas instead of circuits. We show that when we sum over cycle covers that have one long cycle and all other cycles have constant length, then the resulting family of polynomials is complete for VW[F] on certain types of graphs.

One of the most important open problems in algebraic complexity theory is to design an efficient deterministic algorithm for computing the rank of linear matrices (usually stated over a set of commutative variables). At present, we know efficient deterministic algorithms when the variables do not commute, and when the variables partially commute (in a limited sense). Also, for the commutative case, a fully polynomial-time rank approximation is known. In this study, we focus on the approximation problem further. We provide a gentle outline of the known algorithms and then highlight some aspects of an approximation algorithm in the setting of partially commutative variables.